Balancing the pressure of tourism with preserving Porto's historical fabric is becoming a tougher battle every day. The issue of short-term tourist rental (local accommodation) in the Sé region, the symbol of the city, has reached such a point that even exceptions are not easily accepted anymore.
The interesting part is that this time the party that stuck with the rules was the Diocese of Porto.
The 15 Percent Limit and the Truth of Sé
According to municipal rules, when the local accommodation rate in a neighborhood exceeds 15%, it is directly declared a restriction area and new licenses are stopped. In the Sé region, this rate is currently at 39.3%. In other words, almost half of the neighborhood is rented to tourists.
Despite this, the Diocese has prepared a huge project worth 16 million euros to renovate the Great Seminary, located in the UNESCO World Heritage site, and establish a new accommodation facility with 53 rooms in its garden.
Municipality Closed the Door, Residents Stand Up
Porto City Council took a very clear stance on this demand:
Incompatibility with the Zoning Plan: It was stated that the existing historical and religious structure of the seminary is incompatible with a commercial hotel business.
Exception Justification Is Insufficient: In limited areas, exceptions are granted only to projects that provide specific public benefits to the city; The municipality did not see such a justification for this project and conveyed its intention to reject the permit request.
Public Reaction: The project hit not only the bureaucracy but also the residents of the district. More than 2,300 signatures have already been collected to ensure that the historical gardens are not touched and the spirit of the neighborhood is preserved.
Although the diocese first turned the project, which it called "monastery accommodation" into a 3-star hotel, and then returned it to its original definition after reactions, the clear attitude of the municipality shows that the balances will not be easily bent on the streets of Sé. The effort to preserve the city's historical identity outweighs the plans of even the most powerful institutions.
Source: Público / Martin Galvão (21 August 2026)
Visit the original source to read full details.
Go to Source ↗